Research Article

Fostering interaction and engagement in remotely delivered mathematics tutorials in an Irish university

Clodagh Carroll 1 *
More Detail
1 Department of Mathematics, Munster Technological University, Cork, IRELAND* Corresponding Author
European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(3), July 2024, 374-393, https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/14715
Published Online: 12 June 2024, Published: 01 July 2024
OPEN ACCESS   836 Views   383 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

With the initial COVID-19 lockdown of March 2020 in Ireland, many modules in university programmes that were designed to be delivered face-to-face were suddenly switched to remote delivery. The difficulty for both lecturers and students in replicating face-to-face interaction and the frequent lack of lecturers’ visibility of students’ work in such a setting created challenges for teachers and learners alike. In the current study, students’ perspectives were sought on the format of remotely delivered tutorials for two first-year engineering mathematics modules. The format of the tutorials was designed to emulate face-to-face delivery as closely as possible and to promote student engagement, with an emphasis on real-time lecturer-student interaction as well as comprehensive visibility on student progress throughout each tutorial by combining an online mathematics assessment system Numbas with the video conferencing platform Zoom. Overall, students found the format to be a positive alternative to face-to-face tutorials and one that compared favourably with alternative delivery methods. It is hoped that the findings of this study would be of use to other practitioners engaged in remotely delivered mathematics tutorials.
Keywords: remotely delivered mathematics tutorials, lecturer-student interaction, student engagement

CITATION (APA)

Carroll, C. (2024). Fostering interaction and engagement in remotely delivered mathematics tutorials in an Irish university. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 374-393. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/14715

REFERENCES

  1. Bejerano, A. R. (2008). The genesis and evolution of online degree programs: Who are they for and what have we lost along the way? Communication Education, 57(3), 408-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520801993697
  2. Busto, S., Dumbser, M., & Gaburro, E. (2021). A simple but efficient concept of blended teaching of mathematics for engineering students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(2), Article 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020056
  3. Chirinda, B., Ndlovu, M., & Spangenberg, E. (2022). Mathematics learners’ perceptions of emergency remote teaching and learning during the COVID-19 lockdown in a disadvantaged context. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(1), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.1.11
  4. Dinu, L. M., Baykoca, A., Dommett, E. J., Mehta, K. J., Everett, S., Foster, J. L. H., & Byrom, N. C. (2022). Student perceptions of online education during COVID-19 lockdowns: Direct and indirect effects on learning. Educational Sciences, 12(11), Article 813. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110813
  5. Doorn, D. J., Janssen, S., & O’Brien, M. (2010). Student attitudes and approaches to online homework. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2010.040105
  6. Drumm, B. T., & Jong, A. S. Y. (2020). A semester like no other: A student and lecturer perspective on the impact of COVID-19 on 3rd level academic life. All Ireland Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 12(3).
  7. Gilbert, H., Hodds, M., & Lawson, D. (2021). ‘Everyone seems to be agreeing at the minute that face-to-face is the way forward’: Practitioners’ perspectives on post-pandemic mathematics and statistics support. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 40(4), 296-316. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrab019
  8. Harris, R., Blundell-Birtill, P., Sutherland, E., & Pownall, M. (2021). Students’ perceptions of online lecture delivery: An empirical mixed-methods investigation. Psychology Teaching Review, 27(1), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsptr.2021.27.1.69
  9. Heraty, C., Mac an Bhaird, C., McGlinchey, A., Mulligan, P., O’Hanrahan, P., O’Malley, J., O’Neill, R., & Vivash, T. (2021). Technological explorations in the move to online mathematics support. MSOR Connections, 19(1), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v19i1.1130
  10. Horspool, A., & Yang, S. S. (2010). A comparison of university student perceptions and success learning music online and face-to-face. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 15-29.
  11. Hyland, D., & O’Shea, A. (2021). The student perspective on teaching and assessment during initial COVID-19 related closures at Irish universities: Implications for the future. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 40(4), 455-477. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrab017
  12. Jaggars, S. S., & Xu, D. (2016). How do online course design features influence student performance? Computers and Education, 95, 270-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.014
  13. Jin, T. (2022). Online interactive face-to-face learning in mathematics in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(2), 300-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2117023
  14. Lishchynska, M., & Palmer, C. (2021). Teaching maths in the time of COVID: The good, the bad and the missing factors. All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 13(1).
  15. Lishchynska, M., Palmer, C., & Cregan, V. (2021). Online mathematics supports in lieu of university tutorials during COVID-19: Student and lecturer perspectives. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 40(4), 417-435. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrab015
  16. Lishchynska, M., Palmer, C., Lacey, S., & O’Connor, D. (2023). Is motivation the key? Factors impacting performance in first year service mathematics modules. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12529
  17. Lowe, T., Mestel, B., & Williams, G. (2016). Perceptions of online tutorials for distance learning in mathematics and computing. Research in Learning Technology, 24. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.30630
  18. Mac an Bhaird, C., Mulligan, P., & O’Malley, J. (2021). Mathematics support centres’ online presence: Provision in Ireland and the UK in 2018. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 40(3), 190-209. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hraa010
  19. Means, B., & Neisler, J. (2021). Teaching and learning in the time of COVID: The student perspective. Online Learning Journal, 25(1), 8-27. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2496
  20. Meehan, M., & Howard, E. (2020). Report on undergraduate mathematics students’ perceptions of the affordances and constraints of the online environment for learning. https://www.ucd.ie/msc/t4media/msc_students_perceptions_online_learning.pdf
  21. Mohammad Zadeh, M., Prendergast, L. J., Tew, J. D., & Beneroso-Vallejo, D. (2023). Conceptualizing engineering student perceptions of synchronous and asynchronous online learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 49(1), 94-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2201178
  22. Mullen, C., Pettigrew, J., Cronin, A., Rylands, L., & Shearman, D. (2021). Mathematics is different: Student and tutor perspectives from Ireland and Australia on online support during COVID-19. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 40(4), 332-355. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrab014
  23. Murat, M., & Bonancini, L. (2020). Coronavirus pandemic, remote learning and education inequalities. Global Labor Organization. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/224765
  24. Ní Fhloinn, E., & Fitzmaurice, O. (2021). Challenges and opportunities: Experiences of mathematics lecturers engaged in emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mathematics, 9(18), Article 2303. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9182303
  25. Platt, C. A., Raile, A. N. W., & Yu, N. (2014). Virtually the same?: Student perceptions of the equivalence of online classes to face-to-face classes. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 489-503.
  26. QQI. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 modifications to teaching, learning and assessment in Irish further education and training and higher education. Department of Further Education, Research, Innovation and Science. https://www.qqi.ie/sites/default/files/2022-04/the-impact-of-covid-19-modifications-to-teaching-learning-and-assessment-in-irish-further-education-and-training-and-higher-education.pdf
  27. Radmehr, F., & Goodchild, S. (2023). A transition to online teaching and learning of mathematics in Norwegian higher education institutions: The perspectives of lecturers and students. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 42(3), 228-248. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrac014
  28. Ran, H., Kim, N. J., & Secada, W. G. (2022). A meta-analysis on the effects of technology’s functions and roles on students’ mathematical achievements in K-12 classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 258-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12611
  29. Roicki, J. (2021, January 14). Encouraging student collaboration in online math. ASCD. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/encouraging-student-collaboration-in-online-math
  30. Rovai, A. P., & Barnum, K. T. (2003). On-line course effectiveness: An analysis of student interactions and perceptions of learning. Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 57-73.
  31. Sarmiento, C. P. (2017). Student perceptions of online homework in mathematics of accounting and finance. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 1122-1125. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7513
  32. Shim, T. E., & Lee, S. Y. (2020). College students’ experience of emergency remote teaching due to COVID-19. Children and Youth Services Review, 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105578
  33. Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication & Information, 2(1), 23-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463631022000005016
  34. Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
  35. Trenholm, S. (2023). Challenges and suggestions regarding the aesthetic experience of mathematics when teaching and learning fully online. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 2(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263231166415
  36. Trenholm, S., & Peschke, J. (2020). Teaching undergraduate mathematics fully online: A review from the perspective of communities of practice. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00215-0
  37. Wang, Q., Huang, C., & Quek, C. L. (2018). Students’ perspectives on the design and implementation of a blended synchronous learning environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3404
  38. Yang, L. H. (2021). Online learning experiences of Irish university students during the COVID-19 pandemic. All Ireland Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 13(1), 1-22.
  39. Zerr, R. (2007). A quantitative and qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of online homework in first-semester calculus. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26(1), 55-73.